Cross-Asset Desk

multi-asset perpetual futuresEdition of 24 September 2026Figures dated at source

multi-asset perpetual futures · head to head

EVEDEX vs Ostium in 2026

EVEDEX vs Ostium is a choice between two designs. EVEDEX matches orders in a book and keeps every market open around the clock; Ostium prices against an oracle, fills from a pool and follows the session of each underlying market. One of the two can be measured from outside; the other cannot.

Weights 32What one account reaches 28Cost of getting in and out 18Custody of the margin 12How the venue has held up 10The book behind the quote How we rate

EVEDEX vs Ostium side by side

Terms read 18 September 2026
What differsEVEDEXOstium
Score of 10067not scored
Pricing modelCentral limit order book, matched off-chain, settled on ArbitrumOracle price, positions filled from a shared liquidity pool
Markets listed52 across six asset classes83 across crypto, equities, ETFs, FX, commodities and indices
Non-crypto breadth5 shares, 1 index, gold via XAUT, silver, crude oil, 2 FX pairs, 2 pre-IPO43 equities, 8 ETFs, 9 FX pairs, 7 commodities, 7 indices
Trading hoursAll markets 24/7, shares and commodities includedStocks 9:30-16:00 ET weekdays; commodities and indices Sun 18:00 - Fri 17:00 ET; crypto 24/7
Orders outside those hoursNot applicable, markets stay openLimit and stop orders queue, market orders are rejected
Fees0.015% maker / 0.045% taker, fixed, with cashback on fees already paidOpening and closing fees per position, plus rollover while it is held
BTC leverage200x up to $50,000 of notional, stepping down above that100x on BTC-USD by its live pairs API
Median BTC depth within 10 bps$19.1 millionNo resting order book to measure
Sign-inWallet signatureEmail with a smart account, or a wallet
MarginCross only, posted in USDTPer-position collateral in USDC

Read from each venue's own documentation and trading terms on 18 September 2026. One formula for the whole site, published before anything was scored.

What separates them

  1. Pricing: a resting order book on EVEDEX, an oracle and a shared pool on Ostium.
  2. Hours: EVEDEX documents 24/7 on every market; Ostium's stocks run 9:30-16:00 ET on weekdays.
  3. Breadth: Ostium lists 83 markets including 43 equities and 8 ETFs, against 52 on EVEDEX.
  4. Depth you can check: EVEDEX held a median $19.1 million of BTC within 10 bps; a pool has no resting book to measure.

Two ways to price a barrel of oil

Ostium quotes what its oracle quotes and fills from a pool: there is no book of resting orders, so there is nothing to walk through and nothing to measure. Its own site frames that as the selling point — full custody, no account approvals, no hidden spreads (Ostium home page, checked 18 September 2026) — and the capacity constraint sits in the pool rather than in a bid stack.

EVEDEX runs a central limit order book matched off-chain, with position data written to Arbitrum as changes accumulate and on every withdrawal (18 September 2026, EVEDEX documentation). That gives a trader something to inspect before sizing an order: in the readings its BTC book held a median $19.1 million within 10 basis points, the middle of 28 polls taken ten minutes apart rather than a figure anyone published.

The hours, which is where they differ most

Ostium inherits the session of each underlying market. Its documentation puts stocks at 9:30 to 16:00 ET on weekdays with day trades auto-closed at 15:45, commodities and indices from Sunday 18:00 to Friday 17:00 ET, and forex from Sunday 17:00, while crypto runs continuously (Ostium market reference, checked 18 September 2026). Outside those windows limit and stop orders queue and market orders are rejected, and the documentation warns that queued orders fill at the first available price after a gap.

EVEDEX states that all 52 of its markets trade 24/7, shares, FX and commodities included (18 September 2026, EVEDEX documentation). A trader can cut a gold or equity position on a Sunday afternoon. The other side of that is worth stating plainly: when the cash market is shut, the price comes from the venue rather than from a broad market, and that quote can move sharply when the underlying reopens.

Breadth against depth

Ostium wins breadth by a wide margin: 43 equities and 8 ETFs against five shares and one index market on EVEDEX, and its BTC market runs to 100x on its live pairs API. If the goal is a specific mid-cap share, the oracle venue is likely to be the only one listing it.

EVEDEX wins on what can be verified before a trade. A pool's capacity is a parameter; a book is a queue of real orders, and the impact of a $100,000 market order on it was 2.06 bps in the readings. For a large position, that difference decides more than the listing count does.

Which one fits which trader

Ostium suits a trader who wants many real-world markets, is comfortable with an oracle price and trades inside the underlying session. EVEDEX suits one who wants a book to inspect, a single cross-margined USDT balance across six asset classes, and the ability to act when the cash market is closed. Neither offers spot markets, options or a fiat off-ramp. And on either of them the same thing is true at the end of a bad hour. The margin behind a leveraged position is all it has, and a market that gaps can take the lot.

EVEDEX — for an order book that never closes

67of 100breakdown

Six asset classes, 52 perpetual markets, and trading terms that keep every one of them quoting 24/7 (18 September 2026, EVEDEX documentation). Orders meet off the chain, Arbitrum settles, a wallet signature is the whole sign-in, and deposits go through automated AML screening. Cross margin in USDT only; 0.015% maker / 0.045% taker ahead of cashback.

In favour

  • Every market documented as open 24/7
  • Median BTC depth of $19.1 million within 10 bps

Against it

  • Five equity markets against 43 on Ostium
  • Positions written to Arbitrum in batches rather than trade by trade

Not for: UK retail clients.

Ostium — for the widest real-world market list

Listed, not scoredpriced by an oracle, not by a resting order book

Ostium prices 83 markets against an oracle and fills them from a pool: 43 equities, 8 ETFs, 9 FX pairs, 7 commodities and 7 indices alongside 9 crypto pairs (Ostium pairs API, checked 18 September 2026). Sign-in is an email that creates a smart account, or a wallet, and the site states there are no account approvals.

In favour

  • 43 equities and 8 ETFs, far beyond any order-book venue here
  • Email or wallet sign-in with no approvals

Against it

  • No resting order book to inspect before sizing an order
  • Non-crypto markets close with the underlying session

Not for: traders who need a market open at the weekend.

Official site: docs.ostium.com

How the comparison was made

Every column here but one is read rather than measured. On 18 September 2026 the desk read each venue's terms and documentation for what it lists, when those markets are open, what it charges, who can move the collateral. Depth nobody publishes, so the desk took it: each BTC perpetual book read on a timer, ten minutes apart, closing 17:58 UTC on 20 September 2026. The desk keeps an account at none of them. The same five criteria, settled on 23 September 2026 and set out on the method page, order the single venue scored here. One half of this pair sits outside the register. A venue is scored on this site only when its own documentation lists four or more asset classes beyond crypto, and Ostium clears that line with five. It is unscored for the other reason: it prices from an oracle and fills from a pool, so the liquidity criterion has no resting book to read on it. Ostium keeps its place in the pair and carries no mark, and the comparison below is set out column by column rather than settled by a total.

The hours are the softest column here, and one page is ordered by them — a line in a venue's own document about when a market is open, not something anyone watched. Custody is read the same way. Depth is measured, but only on BTC, the one contract all of these venues run; thickness there says nothing about the XAUT book beside it. Fees are the day-one rate, nothing a trader earns back taken off.

The order-book readings

One of the two venues on this page keeps a resting book. Its BTC perpetual was read on a timer, ten minutes apart, closing 17:58 UTC on 20 September 2026, and every figure below is the median of the polls that answered.

VenueMedian spreadMedian depth within 10 bpsMedian impact, $100,000 order$10,000 round trip, taker feesSnapshots
EVEDEX4.12 bps$19.1 million2.06 bps$9.0028
OstiumNothing was polled. Ostium quotes from an oracle and fills from its pool, so there is no resting bid or offer to time, to add up or to walk an order through.

Readers' questions

Is EVEDEX better than Ostium?

They answer different questions. For the widest set of real-world markets, Ostium lists 83 against 52. For a book a trader can measure and markets that stay open at the weekend, EVEDEX is the one documenting both, with a median $19.1 million of BTC depth in the readings.

What is the difference between an order book and an oracle venue?

An order book fills a trade against resting orders from other traders, so depth can be inspected before sizing. An oracle venue takes a price from a feed and fills from a shared pool, so capacity is a pool parameter rather than a queue of bids and offers anyone can see.

Does Ostium close at the weekend?

Its non-crypto markets do, following the underlying session: stocks trade 9:30 to 16:00 ET on weekdays, commodities and indices from Sunday evening to Friday evening. Limit orders placed outside those windows queue until the market reopens, and market orders are rejected.

ostium nasdaq equity perpetuals

Both list a TSLA market. The difference is when: Ostium follows the New York session, while EVEDEX states its equity markets trade around the clock. Neither gives ownership of a share, a dividend or a vote — both are contracts on the price.

Which has higher leverage?

On BTC, EVEDEX at 200x for positions up to $50,000 of notional, against 100x on Ostium's live pairs API. On equities and commodities the ladders are lower on both, and the higher the multiple the shorter the distance to liquidation on a gapping market.

Do either of them require KYC?

Neither asks for identity documents to open a position. Ostium's site states there are no account approvals at all; EVEDEX states that it does not operate traditional KYC and screens deposits automatically. Both still exclude sanctioned persons and several countries in their terms of use, which apply whichever one you pick.

Cross-Asset Desk Research
Updated: